Since Ron Clark became ill, and especially over the past
year or so, I have known very little of the news. Sometimes, Ron and I would watch the local
news together in the mornings or at night.
We welcomed heartwarming stories of people who were paying it forward
and of our southwestern Michigan
communities thriving. We mourned at all
the tragedy, especially each trumped-up violent or horrific atrocity. These seemed almost too much to bear when we
were also facing his terminal illness.
And things got busier. And
eventually, we stopped watching. We
would get the news we wanted from the internet – from Facebook and from his
forums. If we wanted to research a story
more, we did it on our own and not through the television. We checked the weather by looking outside,
especially once I took off work to care for him. Five months ago, our news bubble shrank
drastically to encompass only what was taking place in our home, going on with
our families or friends, and what medical appointments Ron had to attend on a
given day.
I have not watched any news whatsoever since he died. I just have not had tolerance for it in my
life. But, I do not live in complete
isolation, so I do know that last Thursday the Supreme Court upheld the
constitutionality of President Obama’s Affordable Health Care Act. (In my head, I hear applause. J)
The mix of emotions that washed through me when I heard the
outcome was vast. Surprise was
first. Then relief that people will be
able to access the care they need without overpricing and preexisting
conditions getting in the way. Joy that
healthcare will become more accessible for everyone,
no matter whom they are or where they come from or what their sex is or what
diseases they may or may not have had. Happiness
that preventative care will be offered and insurance companies will be held
more accountable. Fear of the news-frenzied
misinformation political backlash I knew would be coming. Frustration with people who do not seem to
grasp the concept in its entirety or see the real life implications (like Ron,
for example), and instead focus on the smallest negative details and paranoia
of the government taking over their lives or forcing them to pay for other people
(is the implication that they are somehow less deserving?) to have easier
access. Pride in Obama and our country for
this monumental step toward a universal healthcare system that will be closer
to that of other developed nations. Anger
that this did not come soon enough to help Ron.
And, as permeates every day and every train of thought I have, my
immense sadness that Ron is gone. I
think he would be pleased with this outcome and I wish he had lived to see the
day when it is implemented. I can even
envision the smile he would have and a few ecstatic expletives he might shout
for good measure.
I cannot pretend to wax political on what it all means or
act like I know every detail or have all the answers. As mentioned, I am pretty much news-free
these days. But, I will direct those who
want to read the full law to the HealthCare.gov website. And, you diehard news junkies don’t need to
worry about me . . . I have enough to process right now. I hope to one day rejoin the world of
concerned citizens who care about all that is happening . . . I just don’t live there
right now.
However, constitutional does not mean the Affordable Health
Care Act is yet implemented or that there won’t be roadblocks and naysayers along
the way. I am quite certain that the
President has his work cut out for him. For
those of us who want to help him in any way we can, I again refer you to the
blog of one brilliant Colleen Cook, who offers a sample letter regarding Ron’s
story that you can send to your federal representative. It could not be easier, since she even
provides the link to contact your representative. You can tweak the letter as appropriate and use
it whenever a need arises along the way to encourage your representative to
support President Obama in implementing and improving the Affordable Health
Care Act.
If you were like me, and missed the news of the day, I refer
you to the White House Blog, where you can learn more and also watch Obama’s speech. He makes it clear, “I didn’t do this because
it was good politics. I did it because I
believed it was good for the county. I
did it because I believed it was good for the American people.”
This law would have been good for Ron, even if he was
initially skeptical of it when I met first him (Ron worried, three years ago
before it was fully introduced, that he would never be able to afford
healthcare because of his genetic disorder and that he would wind-up having to
pay a tax to be uninsured). If this law would
have gone into implementation while Ron was younger, it would have provided him
with access to the health care he so desperately needed and went without for
nearly a decade. It also would have required him to maintain the health
insurance he needed (while making it affordable to him) rather than going
without care (or else risk paying the dreaded tax). I tend to think that people value what they
are paying for, whether through their earnings or whether through a subsidized insurance or public health program. I suspect Ron
would have made use of that insurance, had he had it. I believe that we all have a personal
responsibility to our bodies . . . to treat them well and keep them functioning
in good shape for as long as we can so that we can be healthy, happy, and live
fulfilling lives. A law that reinforces
that concept would have done wonders for Ron.
I truly and fully believe that his outcome would be much different if he’d
lived during the time of the Affordable Health Care Act than the tragedy that actually
happened during his short lifetime.
One of my dear friends, Charles Thomas, writes a column for
a local newspaper. Today, his column was
about Ron Clark. Ron and Charles became
good friends, sharing news stories and interest in technological gadgetry and swapping
ideas about books to read and documentaries to watch. They were nerd buddies . . . and I love my
nerds. I know Ron would be so honored
that Charles chose to write about him this week. The piece Charles wrote could not be anymore
timely, coming on the heels of the Supreme Court’s decision and just before
Independence Day. I encourage you to
read Charles’ “Beyond Red and Blue” column and to follow his advice to think of
Ron this Fourth of July . . . and any day that you need to be reminded of the
real implications behind the need for healthcare reform.
Thanks, Charles, for sharing the legacy of Ron.
Comments
Post a Comment